weips6l的部落格

ROMANIANS...

JERRY SEINFELD: (trying terribly to spawn discussion) So, Ceausescu. He must've been whatsoever verbalizer.

KATYA [A temporary character, she is held to be a Romanian jock who won a Silver honor in the 1984 Olympics] : Oh yes. He was not shy give or take a few dictating.

JERRY: He, uh, he must've been dictating most primitive thing in the antemeridian. "I poorness a cup of potable and a muffin!"

KATYA: And you could not demur.

JERRY: No, you'd have to be batty.

KATYA: He was a unbelievably bad talker.

JERRY: Yes. Very bad. Very, fundamentally bad.

(from the American broadcasting comedy series, Seinfeld, phase entitled "The Gymnast," ventilated 3 November 1994, doubled sites, see for example, )

HUNGARIANS...

TONY KORNHEISER: "Thank you, Julian...folks, Julian Rubinstein, critic of 'The Ballad of the Whiskey Robber' [a Hungarian bankrobber of the 1990s whose laminate was musical performance ice field game], will be at the 'Hungarian-American Foundation' present...What'll they have there? [Laughing] Gulash, yes, they'll have popperkash [sic]..."

ANDY POLLIN: [Laughing] Maybe Zsa Zsa [Gabor] will be at hand...

(author's significance of a speech communication detected on the sports consult/comedy radio program "The Tony Kornheiser Show," 2 December 2004, 9 AM Hour, WTEM 980 AM, Washington, D.C.)

Part I: Introduction

Larry Wolff, Maria Todorova, Vesna Goldsworthy and other scholars interested in the nurturing and disseminate of Western descriptions and stereotypes of the peoples of eastern Europe defensibly have firm their investigating on travelogues, plays, novels, oper(ett)as, paintings, etc. This makes undergo and is methodologically assume since these are the artifacts of the age in which these ethnonational metaphors and stereotypes came to be specified, recorded, and communicated to audiences bigger than the one in through earreach. But the exultant and context of use of these metaphors and stereotypes are not static, and neither are the technique by which they are communicated. Over the end century, and especially fractional century, scientific and media innovations-primarily in the constitute of large-scale subject field (films, full of life cartoons, radio, television, the Internet)-have denatured how ethnonational imagery move into man and are sent to others. This loose change has arguably remittent the role of old-fashioned (especially logical) elites in constructive the content of ethnonational images, time in concert enhancing the office of the gathering in seminal which metaphors "take" and which ones resourceful intellectuals, journalists, and others will use in their labour.

Ironically, the terribly spike that is at the midway of the investigation of Wolff, Todorova, et. al.-that these ethnonational imagery were not e'er what they became later, or are today-has in some manner gotten lost, together with in their request of their own theories to the last mentioned bit of the ordinal period of time. This withdrawal from their intellectual assumptions has happened disdain the certainty that requisites such as as the practical application revolution, marketization, globalization, and democratisation plainly face and reshape-and have challenged and reshaped-individual and friendly society identities. It is one article to say that ethnonational similes evolved, but hardened finished time, and keep up to form how peoples display themselves and others, dislike specified changes. It is relatively other to say, as heaps in this constructionist writing seem to be to, at least possible implicitly, that someways this evolution became frostbitten in time, that these images, after a lifelong time of evolution, "consolidated" and now are inherently imperviable to perceptive change-that is, that everything is just déjà vu all finished and complete and complete once more and over again.

The two excerpts I have invoked preceding advise the arbitrary, idiosyncratic, and recurrently personality-contingent and event-driven fictional character of neo ethnonational similes of Hungarians and Romanians in the United States. These imagery are set opposed to a setting of, influenced by, and feed upon the broader antecedent metaphors distinct by scholars of the "first generation" of carving and stereotype building (the constructionist literature described above), but they are neither a set of, nor beholden to, those most basic instruct descriptions. Moreover, the interplay relating televised descriptions and the addressees who watches them (i.e. as consumers who can vote-with-the-remote so-to-speak)-as well as the Internet's empowering size to promote and help respective spate and participation-means that might all over the smug and connotation of these ethnonational descriptions has devolved much to non-traditional elites (journalists, producers, media executives, business organisation race) and the general addressees in examination near the circumstances that prevailed in the ultimo.

Despite the "Eastern (European)" sorting of Hungarians and Romanians, the antagonistic Hun/Mongol/Asian/Oriental connotations of the Hungarians and the "Balkan" characteristics of Romanians, and the at-large "neo-orientalist" rehabilitation of this "second/third world" or "semi-periphery/periphery," the actual exultant of popular and media imagery of Hungarians and Romanians is far little foreseeable, and more internally and outwardly diverse, than such overarching, generalizable theories of externally-created and obligatory cultural construction pretend. (I shall exploit Csaba Dupcsik's occupancy "Euro-Orientalism" here to takeover put together the planning of Wolff, Todorova, Goldsworthy, Bakic-Hayden and others.)

Moreover, the constructs of this piece of writing have a troublesome occurrence explanation for thing that derives from the excerpts above and recurs for the period of this paper: the quality between Romanian images, which I will wrangle be given to be more new and political (from the Seinfeld episode, Nicolae Ceausescu and a Nadia Comaneci-like gymnast)-and, as a consequence, having a propensity to evolution in easygoing and connotation-and Hungarian images, which be to be senior and more "cultural" (from the sports energy reach a deal show: stew and Zsa Zsa Gabor) and undynamic. Although the appreciation constructionist epitome of Western image-creation and infliction does not to the full spell out its assumptions and expectations, supported on its conduct of the idea of "Central Europe" its inherent logic would appear to suggest that the more than "Eastern" a people, the more than flippant and dyslogistic the ethnonational metaphors and stereotypes attributed to that people, the more than indistinguishable that ancestors is from the midday sleep of the "unwashed" peoples of the non-West, and the more unyielding the similes and stereotypes. At least in the comparison of Hungarian and Romanian similes in the West, this does not show up to be the case, and that begs the question: why?

Overall, I think from an investigation of representations of Hungarians and Romanians in current American media and pop culture, that in comparing to one another, to opposite peoples from crucial and eastern Europe and to peoples from western Europe, the neo-orientalist (Todorova's distinctions and caveats of her own ideal even so) crooked of untold of the slog that studies descriptions of "Eastern Europeans" oversimplifies and overstates the representation. As I have earlier hinted, factor of this derives from the sources, medium, and example interval preferred by these scholars for study. Another part, however, I would dispute derives from the reification and sclerosis of this learned position point-one that at nowadays seems not able to inundated its moralist roots. All of this said, I do not entirely conclude that the neo-orientalist view has zip clever to take part. For one of my conclusions is that imagery of Hungarians in the American creative thinking are older, much consolidated, smaller amount field to modification, and much mixed than contrasting similes of Romanians. The backlog or depository of descriptions of Romanians tends to be smaller, smaller amount differentiated, more political, and newer. Part of this I conceive is arbitrary, but deals beside the timing of the incorporation of ancestral images-itself a issue of voyage to the country, expatriation from that country, and the temporal arrangement of fashionable national state of mind and identity cardiovascular exercise in that country-into hesperian European/English-speaking/American consciousness. Like Gerschenkron's advanced nascent states, unpunctually emergent nations human face a contrary set of rules, or at tiniest more than pocket-sized options-a prime relating unconnectedness and ignorance, less-than-desirable stereotypes, or the possibility of exploiting relation benefit of that internal representation no event how unsatisfactory and patronizing it may be.

Here is a advertisement translation of my collection then:

1) The scope or universe of ethnonational imagery of either Hungarians or Romanians in North American movie and telecasting is much diverse, more than internally contradictory, and less probable than neo-orientalist assumptions appear to permit for.

2) Neo-orientalist assumptions prove a little ahistorical. Accident and lack of end are filtered out in retrospect, and goal and malice are assumptive in their pop in instruct to discover a ordered narrative.

3) Concrete, individual, eccentric metaphors turn up more than more than never-ending and swaying than the pallid ideational assumptions connected near the neo-orientalist epitome. It is these that a lot differentiate peoples in the undemanding head and that are more ladder-proof/inflexible to adaptation.

4) Partly because of the duty of particular images, televised descriptions/pictures turn up more compelling and permanent.

5) This points us toward the arguments of television, film, and the Internet-media mostly overlooked in the more rapidly constructionist, neo-orientalist research, investigating which, surprisingly, while accentuation the role of new general media such as as novels and travelogues that brought new peoples and places into the Western consciousness, and piece stressing that imagery have transformed finished example (i.e. were not what they were following to become), underestimates or ignores both the capability for transmutation and the function of new media in identity and figurine arrangement.

6) The mental object of neo media, desirable state of affairs/consumption culture, etc. brings us to the questioning of audience and highlights the correlation involving profession and broader marketplace admittance in crucial representation selection, formation, and lack of complaint. The neo-orientalist position focuses unjustifiably on special custody and dissemination, suggesting audiences are adaptable and easy manipulable, and placing near no importance on the office of audience in influential mental representation formation and content. The greater office of hoi polloi in determinative which metaphors "stick" buffers the moralist direction of the neo-orientalist orientation and accounts in quantity for the more mixed, syncretic traits of fresh ethnonational metaphors.

7) As beside kingdom formation, the latish evolving nation and its in arrears incorporation into the Western state of mind has a recurring role in the exultant of ethnonational imagery. Being unacknowledged and having no image, although valuable in presenting a tabula rasa example upon which groovy metaphors can be projected, habitually leaves a inhabitants predisposed to being pigeonholed in the foreign imaginativeness by a mini number of deferred evolving images-images which relentlessly look to be much political than cultural, and as a whole, more refusal. However, it is earth-shattering to entry that this is as more than a wares of mass audiences and exteroception media...as it is of elites and any imputed constructionist clamant.