I cognize that for oodles of you this may be suchlike a unreasonable question, but as a party who is now lock, stock and barrel sober, I focus it's an fascinating interrogate to ask. If you would have asked me 5 geezerhood ago if I was a remedy addict, I would have told you NO. But now, looking hindmost at the situation, I agnize that I was. I drank alcohol, fairly a bit, and preserved cigarettes and wouldn't have reasoned myself a tablets addict? Five eld ago, really not. But when you genuinely have a sneaking suspicion that roughly speaking this, I was. Alcohol is a drug, and I drank ordinary. Nicotine is a drug, and I obstructed fluff a pack of those bad boys a day as well. So at the end of the day, I was a tablets junky.
But this isn't how we're educated to ponder nearly this state is it? We're schooled that the possession 'drug addict' is aloof for those who engage in belongings approaching heroine, cocaine, or meth, right? We're schooled by one and all that these are the physical remedy addicts and drink and cigarettes can be dealt near. So, who teaches us these things? Everything that you see or perceive in well-nigh any manner of advertising, that's what. Drinking is construed as "cool" and smoking, piece not openly called "cool" anymore, can stagnant be seen that way. Besides, smoky a short time ago fits so recovered next to consumption that they both seem to be pieces of the self bewilder. But the stand rank is that intoxicant and cigarettes, mega alcohol, are viewed as distance to 'unwind', instead than thing really cynical.